The mere fact that those answers add up to a pile of horse manure does not matter. What matters here is that someone just might believe this fantasy.
A for "profit" company will never be able to "meet the staffing needs" because they artificially inflate the number of actual staffing. In order to "maximize" profits the staffing levels are kept at a bare bones level. It is only through the intervention of TSA that an increase in staffing occurs. What would change if CAS were to get another airport? Nothing! Generating profits, not providing top notch security service is the main focal point.
The solution that CAS applies can best be described as robbing Peter to pay Paul. Gutting the CTX community of DFO's to man the checkpoints is only one of the problems. They would much rather have baggage miss a flight than have the passenger ticked off.
The Mike Bolles solution is laughable. If he would apply the same standards to our wonderful management team who would be left? Hey, Mike, let's paint everyone with the same brush and standards. The corporate culture has to set an example. So far the example has been shameful.
Clean house first and lead by example, not with threats and intimidation.
A blog dedicated to the TSOs, LTSOs, and BDOs at San Francisco International Airport that work for Covenant Aviation Security, LLC (CAS).
can you post this comment in every news articles associates airport opting out like the one in Charlotte Oberserver?
ReplyDeleteI urge every single tso working at SFO to send all articles about the joke of opting out and the letter fron boardingarea.com ( Charlotte opting out of the TSA ) to the San Francisco airport commission and the TSA headquarter.
ReplyDeletewe are doing our part at federalize sfo screeners , please do yours.It's OUR commmmun fight against the vultures of the private pseudo-security.