Should it be the company that submits the lowest bid? Should it be a company that is well known? Just what should this decision be based upon?
How about this? How about awarding this contract to a company that will not put "profit before product "! How about awarding this contract to a company that has a proven track record and a thorough understanding of what security is all about?
How about awarding this contract to a company that will respect and appreciate the contributions of the workforce?
How about a company that can motivate and inspire the workforce with their leadership skills and professional example?
We want a company that will respect and listen to our concerns and respond to them in a positive way.
CAS found out the hard way that threats and intimidation will not work. The working relationship that CAS has with the workforce is deplorable. CAS has had over ten years to get it right, and they have failed to do so.
CAS should not be allowed to have an opportunity to once again put profit before product. They should not be allowed to further damage the remnants of the morale and team spirit that once existed at SFO.
Could it be that the TSA is the best option for SFO?