This offer is full of take away items and give backs.
The
company wants you to focus on the raise that they want to give you.
They want you to focus on the number of sick hours we will receive.
They want you to focus on the fact that they will pay 85% of any
hospitalization costs if you are admitted for care. They want you to
focus on your PTO carryover and new accrual table. It's a classic case
of misdirection!
Focus on this instead:
Under
this latest plan, you would lose your parking allowance. Your PTO
accrual rate would be lower than it was under the old plan. Your
up-front and out-of-pocket expenses for your medical coverage would
skyrocket.
The
raise that they plan to give us would be funded by the givebacks and
takeaway items. Do the math! Multiply the monthly parking allowance by
twelve. Compare the number of PTO days that we should have to what
they are offering, and then multiply that by your hourly wage. Your
co-pay per medical visit would double. Your hospitalization cost would
go from zero to 15% of the total cost, to a maximum of $3,000 per year.
And that is just for someone with no dependents! That number jumps to
$6,000 for someone with a family.
Now,
total up these differences (along with some that we have not listed),
and subtract from that total the amount of the raise that they plan to
award us. As you can see, they would be giving us a raise with the
money that they are planning to take away from us. Imagine this: you
take $2000 from me, then later tell me, "You're such a good friend, I'm
going to give you $500 as a gift." Can we see how they don't want us to
focus on where the money is coming from? Is it truly a benefit to us?
Now why would SEIU tell us to vote "yes" on an offer like this?
Let's
see! CAS declared that negotiations were at an impasse. An impasse
means that we are now an "Open Shop." An "Open Shop" means that no one
has to pay any dues -- which means that the union is working for free.
Yikes! They can't have that!
So,
what's a union to do? How about accepting and endorsing an offer like
this to get the dues money flowing again. Never mind that it is a very
bad deal for the employees; they want their dues.
We
heard through the rumor mill that the union plans to put this offer up
for vote early next week. Spend some time reviewing for yourself the
information that we have just presented.
We strongly urge a "No" vote on this latest insult!