Upper management has recently stated that "the contract for SFO is ours to lose." How did they reach that conclusion? Did they make another backroom deal?
What they refuse to acknowledge is just how tenuous the positions of upper management are.
Should another company assume control of security at SFO, they would inherit an experienced workforce that has done fairly well under the Covenant management team. Upper management would be replaced with a leadership team from the acquiring company.
Just imagine what the workforce could accomplish with a management team that actually cared about their employees! Just imagine what it would be like to work for a company that puts product before profit.
Remember, "it's performance versus potential." Can and will the workforce improve their attitude and professionalism under new leadership?
Fear not the future; things have a way of working out!
